Precedential judgment of the CJEU on VAT obligation point in relation to construction services - C 224/18, Budimex S.A

Jesteśmy kancelarią, którą tworzą ludzie 
o ogromnej pasji, wiedzy i doświadczeniu. Nasz zespół stale się powiększa.

Kancelaria Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak specjalizuje się w wielu branżach, w tym w prawie cywilnym, handlowym oraz administracyjnym. Oferują wsparcie w sprawach dotyczących fuzji i przejęć, a także w kwestiach związanych z ochroną danych osobowych. Ich doświadczenie obejmuje również doradztwo w zakresie prawa pracy oraz sporów sądowych, co czyni ich wszechstronnym partnerem dla klientów z różnych sektorów.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Prawo spółek, fuzje i przejęcia
Showing 0 of 100
No results found.
There are no results with this criteria. Try changing your search.
Alert
07.05.2019
Precedential judgment of the CJEU on VAT obligation point in relation to construction services - C 224/18, Budimex S.A

On 2 May 2019 the Court of Justice of the EU handed down a precedential judgment in a Polish case concerning the moment when VAT obligation arises for construction and assembly services (case C 224/18, Budimex S.A.).

The Court accepted that performance of building services takes place at the moment of the official handover/acceptance of this service if:

  1. the parties’ contract provides (e.g. by way of a reference to the FIDIC rules) that

    a handover/acceptance protocol is necessary for the performance of the building service;

  2. the formal handover protocol is contractually defined as moment of completion of the service and setting forth the final amount of payment due for the service.

According to the CJUE in such circumstances the VAT obligation arises upon the lapse of 30 days from the moment of the signing of the handover/acceptance protocol, and not upon the lapse of 30 days from the moment of actual (physical) completion of the building work (unless respective invoice was issued earlier).

This judgment differs from the hitherto position of the Minister of Finance and of Polish administrative courts, which treated rather the moment of actual completion of works as the moment of performance of the service, regardless of handover/acceptance formalities.

This judgment may in some cases also apply in relation to cases in which work was not fully completed because of a dispute, while the tax authorities required settlement of VAT on work partially performed.

Pursuant to the Polish Tax Ordinance, within one month as from an official publication of the judgment it is possible to renew tax proceedings in final tax decisions which differ from the position taken by CJUE in this judgment.

If you are wondering whether the judgment of the CJEU may be applicable in your case, also in the context of carrying out the entire procedure of renewing tax proceedings, we invite you to contact us.